SevenOfDiamonds
Registered
LGB's standard KOF diesel has been issued as 2090(0) and 24900 (plus a ToyTrain" version) with plain wheels, and as 21900 (analogue) and 24900 (digital) with counter-weighted wheels and, most relevantly to my question, remote uncouplers.
I have acquired (and successfully bench-tested) the remote uncouplers and original circuit boards from a 23900, and was hoping to fit them to a 2090(0) that I already own. However, the footplate moulding are very different. The 2090(0) uses flat plates to retain the motor block, and provide the fixing for the standard couplers, while the 21900/23900 use the remote uncouplers to retain the motor block, and have square openings on the upper surface at each end of the footplate (into which the remote uncouplers protrude) . . .
One option is to take a razor saw to the footplate of my 2090(0) to create openings for the remote uncoupler units but, once cut, if that doesn't work, it won't be possible to reuse it as a 2090(0). Has anyone already done this? And are there any tips to prevent me getting it wrong?
Alternatively, does anyone happen to have a spare 21900/23900 footplate? Or (since I have read about others having reliability issues with the remote uncouplers) does anyone want to revert their 21900/23900 to standard couplers by swapping their footplate (and ancillary parts) for mine?
I'm not holding out any great expectations of positive responses, but I thought there was no harm in asking.
All the best
David
I have acquired (and successfully bench-tested) the remote uncouplers and original circuit boards from a 23900, and was hoping to fit them to a 2090(0) that I already own. However, the footplate moulding are very different. The 2090(0) uses flat plates to retain the motor block, and provide the fixing for the standard couplers, while the 21900/23900 use the remote uncouplers to retain the motor block, and have square openings on the upper surface at each end of the footplate (into which the remote uncouplers protrude) . . .
One option is to take a razor saw to the footplate of my 2090(0) to create openings for the remote uncoupler units but, once cut, if that doesn't work, it won't be possible to reuse it as a 2090(0). Has anyone already done this? And are there any tips to prevent me getting it wrong?
Alternatively, does anyone happen to have a spare 21900/23900 footplate? Or (since I have read about others having reliability issues with the remote uncouplers) does anyone want to revert their 21900/23900 to standard couplers by swapping their footplate (and ancillary parts) for mine?
I'm not holding out any great expectations of positive responses, but I thought there was no harm in asking.
All the best
David