Greg Elmassian
Guest
So the 1235/12350 was 660 / 950 radii... and the 12360 is 600 mm on both?
so on the 12350 r2/r3 indicates the number of degrees in a circle of track, not the curvature of the turnout, which is really a R1 / R2+
and on the 12360 apparently even though the length is the same degrees of an R3 curve, the curvature of the turnout is R1 on both routes.
The reason I am beating this to death is that people see R2 or R3 applied to this switch and think, oh great, I can get a 3 way switch that matches my R3 curves, and then their loco derails because the curvature of the points themselves is R1....
Maybe in the old days when everyone had trains that could run on R1 curves this bias towards the degrees of a circle of track for track planning made sense.
Nowadays, few people buy only locos that can handle R1 curves... and newcomers seem to always buy a loco too big for their track ha ha..
Greg
so on the 12350 r2/r3 indicates the number of degrees in a circle of track, not the curvature of the turnout, which is really a R1 / R2+
and on the 12360 apparently even though the length is the same degrees of an R3 curve, the curvature of the turnout is R1 on both routes.
The reason I am beating this to death is that people see R2 or R3 applied to this switch and think, oh great, I can get a 3 way switch that matches my R3 curves, and then their loco derails because the curvature of the points themselves is R1....
Maybe in the old days when everyone had trains that could run on R1 curves this bias towards the degrees of a circle of track for track planning made sense.
Nowadays, few people buy only locos that can handle R1 curves... and newcomers seem to always buy a loco too big for their track ha ha..
Greg