The ESC will do what it is told..
If the receiver is programmed to continue outputting a signal, even (say) with the transmitter switched off.
The ESC will continue to power the loco.
PhilP
Phil,
That does not line up with what I observed; my observation of the receiver valid signal LED was that it was off when no transmitter signal was being received.
So that I was getting the same results I used the same transmitter and same receiver for each ESC.
2 ESC's HobbyKing and Pololu both stopped (one spec states that it will stop, the others spec is indeterminate so its operation cannot be taken into account) and the Viper did not.
The fact that the valid signal LED was not lit on the receiver each time the transmitter was off, leads me to believe that the Viper is possibly remembering the last valid receiver signal and does not change till another valid signal is received again (when the transmitter was turned back on) most like a software instruction.
I have concluded that there is some code in the software that tells the Viper to ignore the loss of transmitter signal, as opposed to the Hobby King ESC that is programmed, again in software, to stop on signal loss.
There is a glaring difference between the Viper and the Hobby King in that the Viper loco 10 is designed for model trains whereas the Hobby King is designed for model aircraft. Lets face it a model train is not going to disappear over the horizon like an aircraft if the transmitter is turned off. If anyone wants to get into "return to base" for aircraft that is a whole new can of worms which is not relevant here anyway.
I feel that comparing different manufacturers ESC or ESC/RX combos is never going to solve this discussion, so I am just going to run (pardon the pun) with what I have on hand and will continue converting my LGB 2076 tank engine to battery R/C.