Oh, those wacky Germans... Prehm does P*rn....

beavercreek said:
Having seen Jon's (zerogee) naughty bits behind the train shed at Chris' (mole) open day today, I can honestly say that Prem have done a fine job of producing an amazing likeness to two, ahem, combatants in full flagrante delicto, right down to the stare of the eyes!
One pair would be ideal to use in a workshop.......................
Click to expand...

Might need to rephrase the first part of the opening sentence ..... :o
 
You know what is said about uncovering in total, the human body, don't you. If something is left to the imagination, it becomes even more desirable.
 
Hahaha, very good find Korm..... though no, they are not made from the Prehm set as far as I can see - the pose of Prehm's "missionary position" couple is similar, but not quite the same, and quality-wise the Prehm ones are better sculpted and more detailed than these! However you could quite easily "dress" one of the new Prehm couples (probably any of the four types) in a similar way, to make an amusing little vignette. :)
One of the pairs has the young lady seated on something (you provide the necessary support for her!) while her male friend is standing - that one would work really well with her bottom perched on a workbench in the corner of a dimly-lit engine shed - after all, who knows what those railway preservation volunteers get up to on the weekends when they're supposed to be working on the locos....? ;) :o

Jon.
 
Zerogee said:
Hahaha, very good find Korm..... though no, they are not made from the Prehm set as far as I can see - the pose of Prehm's "missionary position" couple is similar, but not quite the same, and quality-wise the Prehm ones are better sculpted and more detailed than these! However you could quite easily "dress" one of the new Prehm couples (probably any of the four types) in a similar way, to make an amusing little vignette. :)
One of the pairs has the young lady seated on something (you provide the necessary support for her!) while her male friend is standing - that one would work really well with her bottom perched on a workbench in the corner of a dimly-lit engine shed - after all, who knows what those railway preservation volunteers get up to on the weekends when they're supposed to be working on the locos....? ;) :o

Jon.
Click to expand...
Now stop giving us ideas..
The 'Harz' at Chasewater is for 'family' entertainment, not creation!

Mind you, it is a very large engine shed!!
;) :D ;D ;D
 
ROSS said:
.....................and to think I once had a post removed because GSC "is a family related" site.....Mmmmmm
funny old world.....
Click to expand...
Ah, but these are 'quality, tasteful models', possibly with a 'naturist' theme..

Not our normal smut!! :o :-[ ;) :D ;D ;D
 
ROSS said:
.....................and to think I once had a post removed because GSC "is a family related" site.....Mmmmmm
funny old world.....
Click to expand...

That's exactly why I daren't post photos, Ross! ;)

Jon.
 
PhilP said:
Ah, but these are 'quality, tasteful models', possibly with a 'naturist' theme..

Not our normal smut!! :o :-[ ;) :D ;D ;D
Click to expand...


OK, I'll attempt to keep this within the forum's high standards. There is a difference between normal human behavior and pornography. The act of "procreation" would be considered a normal human function, in my opinion. Breast feeding a child would be normal. Other than those two, I cannot think of any "sexually" related acts that could be discussed amongst all ages. You guys are a bit more open when it comes to sex on view to the public at large, as in TV. Those on the continent are even more advanced. While, here in the states, we've made viewing the human body a no no. It is getting better however. That said, we can watch acts of unspeakable violence, but one slip of a garment, and the media is all over it. So my bottom line is that while we should be able to discuss these figures, would it be better to post the pictures of them or ramble on about their acts in way too many words?
 
Madman said:
.....You guys are a bit more open when it comes to sex on view to the public at large, as in TV. Those on the continent are even more advanced. While, here in the states, we've made viewing the human body a no no. It is getting better however. That said, we can watch acts of unspeakable violence, but one slip of a garment, and the media is all over it.........
Click to expand...

I think everywhere has their share of double standards, Dan - but I agree that the US media seems to have it worse than most - but then, that's why you have HBO! ;) :o

Jon.
 
But Jon, I don't have HBO. Rats!
 
Madman said:
You know what is said about uncovering in total, the human body, don't you. If something is left to the imagination, it becomes even more desirable.
Click to expand...
STREWTH.... Last time I was caught nude in public the only question asked was "Whatever Trev is wearing needs ironing"
 
A couple of years ago one of the German manufacturers had battery powered 'action' models....... :o
 
I once got 'thumped' by a female Comms. Engineer who turned up onsite with a large-handled screwdriver in shocking pink!
It was when I asked where she put the batteries!! :o :-X ;) :D ;D ;D
 
Makes my two attempts at Metales Modeles - Phoenix Folies (the golfer and the lady fishing) that I did last year look rather tame by comparison. Would hardly make the middle page of "Tit-Bits". Oh you remember those days do you? You naughty boy :o :o :o :o :o :o
 
[quote author=Glengrant link=topic=299470.msg324681#msg324681 date=1408529122]
Would hardly make the middle page of "Tit-Bits". Oh you remember those days do you? You naughty boy :o :o :o :o :o :o
[/quote]

Tit-Bits.....oh the nostalgia of it all..............
But was it really like this?.....

Ena Sharples 1968.jpg
 
ROSS said:
It was originally a magazine that is described today as" sound bites"..bits and pieces...........nowt to do wit T*ts......... that is until the late 60's and early 70's when it shifted into pinups etc., (top shelf in those days!!). Pleased the furtive types ::) It was originally started by the publishers of Country Life pre WW2 No doubt some of you remember Health and Efficiency...Razzle and the other types that were quite risqué then, but very tame today!

SEE http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tit-Bits.


Quite interesting
Click to expand...

I'm beginning to think you may be human after all Ross... The Australian Naturist was considered very top shelf here and I could never figure out why, in all the full frontals, not one bronzed Aussie naturist had genitals. As kids this was most intriguing...
 
ROSS said:
It was originally a magazine that is described today as" sound bites"..bits and pieces...........nowt to do wit T*ts......... that is until the late 60's and early 70's when it shifted into pinups etc., (top shelf in those days!!). Pleased the furtive types ::) It was originally started by the publishers of Country Life pre WW2 No doubt some of you remember Health and Efficiency...Razzle and the other types that were quite risqué then, but very tame today!

SEE http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tit-Bits.


Quite interesting
Click to expand...

Not that I want to encourage this Kind Of Thing, but I can still remember when my German master at school was elected Mr Sunshine in H&E. Sadly, though, the copy of the magazine was only passed around the Senior Common Room for staff to thumb through, where apparently it met with almost unanimous approval. How times change .... ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top