All I want is a reliable source and it's not wind.Ian_S said:C'mon guys - be honest with yourselves.......
What would you rather have at the foot of your garden - A wind turbine or a nuclear reactor....?
Within 12 miles of me I have both. At least the reactor keeps me warm on a still and cold night.Ian_S said:C'mon guys - be honest with yourselves.......
What would you rather have at the foot of your garden - A wind turbine or a nuclear reactor....?
Fair point.doverles said:what was the answer to Jeff's question then
Glad it has worked Jeff but at least we had a good old rant!Jeff said:The answewr as ever was as simple as can be.
I was impressed by the 2.4ghz system bought to replace a failed oild unit, so I bought another matching receiver, installed it this morning and matched it to my TX - what a difference. The loco ran under complete control - and on its first run was under the severe gaze of the son of one of my wifes pals. Bitter experienc of life has always been that if something is going to go wrong it will happen with a critical audience - so if 2.4gHz works then I give it my very best recommendation
Maybe but what are the alternatives?? Nuclear? OMG yeah!!! solar at best about 15% efficiency and the sun does have to shine on them and then what happens when darkness falls?Stainzmeister said:Windfarms are absolute crap.
The power they produce (When they work) costs twice as much as any conventional power station (Gas, coal or nuclear).
They are heavily subsidised by the government - another whopping financial mistake.
To top that they look bloody awful.
Woderwick said:I think solar panels are great in principle. Currently in the UK suppliers offer resonable warranties on the panels themselves, but I have not seen any that offer more than 3 years on the inverters. If they go west it's mucho dosh. Until they lengthen the warranty period it's a no no for me.