Apologies in advance for repeating some of what Martin has already explained - Phil, Greg and Dan, your comments and advice are appreciated and useful for MFX decoders IN GENERAL, but don't seem to apply in the particular case.
There is something odd and non-standard about the decoder installed in this specific loco, the LGB 20752 "Kleine Dicke" Borsig 0-4-0. The ability to access and/or reprogram certain CVs is disabled in this decoder, whether through fault or design. Both mine and Martin's examples of this same model are responding (or failing to respond) in exactly the same way, so (unless we've both been EXTREMELY unlucky - the two locos were bought from different suppliers in different countries) it's a "feature" rather than an individual faulty decoder. M/LGB do seem to acknowledge this by the fact that the icons on the box do state that sound is not available on DC for this model, something that I'm not disputing but have been trying to find a way around - it appears at the moment that it is not possible.
So, the interesting question is "why"?
Are these CVs locked out deliberately at the factory, or because there is some problem with the decoder batch?
Is it a rather strange marketing choice to try to encourage people to move away from DC to either DCC or MFX?
Is it a way of M/LGB using up a batch of faulty or reject decoders that work in every other way but this, so they put them into a batch of "budget" MFX locos?
There is no dispute that this particular model is VERY cheap for an MFX/sound equipped loco - it is almost half the price of any other MFX-chipped product in LGB's current range, and given that it works just fine on MFX or DCC systems it is (or was, because it is not now listed as available new so the batch is presumably all gone) a perfectly acceptable little loco model. It even RUNS quite happily on DC, it just has no sound functions on it.
Does anyone else on here have an example of THIS EXACT MODEL that they could test, and see if their results correspond with Martin's and mine?
Jon.
Edit: posted this at just about the same moment as Martin's latest post above, so apologies if we're echoing each other....