Greg Elmassian
Guest
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c720/2c720931c9a0f84d644efbdd607854120d8c774e" alt="United-States Country flag"
No, you are underthinking this (Greg, you are overthinking this. If the wheels are 40mm back-to-back and metal, then they are no different from LGB metal wheels in the possibility of causing a short. Clearly if you were intent on using washers as Eric tried, you would file the outer rim to the right diameter and the washer and flange to the correct back-to-back. However, as I said, trying to file 4 wheels to similar profiles on a drill in a vise is not likely to produce a good result, and why bother as there are so many wheels available that will work without washers or filing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3803a/3803af37af2003c2e1a4ef94c013194e0b0aa814" alt="Covered Laugh :giggle: :giggle:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8596f/8596f86fc68531f77089b2d66649d2641161f3b8" alt="Wink ;) ;)"
My point is about the flange thickness with adding a washer to an existing flange.
The flange occupies the space between the non-moving rail and the moving rail.... if you increase the thickness of the flange a lot, you run the risk of a short in track power.... more metal in less space... the wheel "assembly" could touch both rails at the same time.
By the way, this is the classic short in a switch, the moving points are "hot" and the derailment causes a wheel to contact the wrong rail.... think about it...
Greg