New Bachmann Lyn
- Thread starter garrymartin
- Start date
Hi
I have both the old and new versions of Lyn. Tim is correct and both body mouldings appear the same. Some changes have occured in the running gear mouldings, both pony trucks have more detail as does the frame.
Measuring up against a scale drawing most appears correct for 1:22.5 except about a scale foot has been added above the lower edge of the cab windows, this has raised the coal bunker and also the front cab windows are now higher than they should be.
The first of Alyn's pictures of Lyn was taken not long after delivery to the Lynton and Barnstaple Railway before it was taken over by the Southern Railway.
Mick
I have both the old and new versions of Lyn. Tim is correct and both body mouldings appear the same. Some changes have occured in the running gear mouldings, both pony trucks have more detail as does the frame.
Measuring up against a scale drawing most appears correct for 1:22.5 except about a scale foot has been added above the lower edge of the cab windows, this has raised the coal bunker and also the front cab windows are now higher than they should be.
The first of Alyn's pictures of Lyn was taken not long after delivery to the Lynton and Barnstaple Railway before it was taken over by the Southern Railway.
Mick
PaulRhB
This Way Up
She is a Bachmann USA model so Lyn herself is a nice by-product really, if you look closely the Southern lettering is too low the numbers are too skinny, the tanks are too high compared to the wheels, she seems a bit short between the cylinders and cab front too if you compare wheelbase and clearances to the cylinders and yes the cab has aquired a bit of height in the window area.
But she's a nice impression much like most of the LGB locos where even the Harz 2-10-2's are stretched and squeezed in various places if you look closely.
If you want a true 1:19th 2ft gauge Lyn then give Trackshack a buzz to order an Accucraft one.
Personally I think for the price she's a nice loco and will do as I doubt I'll afford the Accucraft one and Lew too.
But she's a nice impression much like most of the LGB locos where even the Harz 2-10-2's are stretched and squeezed in various places if you look closely.
If you want a true 1:19th 2ft gauge Lyn then give Trackshack a buzz to order an Accucraft one.
Personally I think for the price she's a nice loco and will do as I doubt I'll afford the Accucraft one and Lew too.
PaulRhB
This Way Up
Well I thought I would compare them too,
On top we have the unaltered model
in the middle, a pasted together almost scale version
on the bottom the original in Southern livery.
I chopped the height of the cab, stretched the tank and also the lettering, stetched the cylinders, shrunk the smokebox and moved the domes.
On top we have the unaltered model
in the middle, a pasted together almost scale version
on the bottom the original in Southern livery.
I chopped the height of the cab, stretched the tank and also the lettering, stetched the cylinders, shrunk the smokebox and moved the domes.
PaulRhB
This Way Up
On the page she doesn't look to be that much more powerful as didn't the 2-6-2's have fractionally wider cylinders? The rumours of poor performance from the 2-6-2's valve gear may have had more of a bearing on actual performance. Paul Lewin who's in charge of Lyd seems to think the 2-6-2's got a bad reputation from initial problems but that they certainly had the potential to be very good locos from the basic design, as they have now proved with Lyd.
Still in a few years we'll be able to tell when they run Lyd & Lyn
Oh dear I've just realised I could have two Accucraft Lew's as Lyd is the same as Lew, (how many years away are they? going to need a bigger piggybank)
Still in a few years we'll be able to tell when they run Lyd & Lyn
Oh dear I've just realised I could have two Accucraft Lew's as Lyd is the same as Lew, (how many years away are they? going to need a bigger piggybank)
Martino
Photography, The GWR, Aviation, Travel, Cars.
Having had a day or so to look over the new Baldwin, it does seem to be a big improvement over the old, particularly in the mechanical area. There also seems to be significant improvements in detailing.
At the price, I think it is very good out of the box, if that's how you run your railway (as many do, and there is nothing wrong implied with that comment). I'm a bodger, so nothing ever stays pristine around here for long, which may account for some dodgy running!
My railway goes for an overall impression, rather than strict accuracy. I don't have a stated scale. I work to around 15mm/ft but around means LGB and similar track (too wide for most British narrow gauge, wrong rail type - flat bottomed not bullhead, over scale ballast - chicken grit, track profile that is over scale for most things, buildings that are both over and under scale, 1:1 raindrops, turtles, snakes, lizzards, dogs and plants!
I'd love to be able to afford or justify affording accurate scale models, but would have I think, serious problems running scale flanges on scale rail in my garden, even if I had the money.
We call this G Scale, which we shouldn't, as it's not a scale. There are precious few standards in what we do. Every manufacturer makes compromises, even the ones that are apparently finer scale models.
I even run an LGB New Orleans streetcar from time to time. Heaven knows how many rubber rulers were used there! Supposedly 5' gauge running on 45mm track! However from a distance it looks great.
I think the same applies to the Baldwin. The model is supposed to represent one of dozens of similar locos ordered by railroads around the world from a catalogue. Lyn was just one of those manufactured with a number of modifications.
I'm grateful to Bachmann for reintroducing something that looks and feels pretty good and at what is really a toy price. Good on them, and I'll echo an earlier comment that their customer service and guarantee is superb.
At the price, I think it is very good out of the box, if that's how you run your railway (as many do, and there is nothing wrong implied with that comment). I'm a bodger, so nothing ever stays pristine around here for long, which may account for some dodgy running!
My railway goes for an overall impression, rather than strict accuracy. I don't have a stated scale. I work to around 15mm/ft but around means LGB and similar track (too wide for most British narrow gauge, wrong rail type - flat bottomed not bullhead, over scale ballast - chicken grit, track profile that is over scale for most things, buildings that are both over and under scale, 1:1 raindrops, turtles, snakes, lizzards, dogs and plants!
I'd love to be able to afford or justify affording accurate scale models, but would have I think, serious problems running scale flanges on scale rail in my garden, even if I had the money.
We call this G Scale, which we shouldn't, as it's not a scale. There are precious few standards in what we do. Every manufacturer makes compromises, even the ones that are apparently finer scale models.
I even run an LGB New Orleans streetcar from time to time. Heaven knows how many rubber rulers were used there! Supposedly 5' gauge running on 45mm track! However from a distance it looks great.
I think the same applies to the Baldwin. The model is supposed to represent one of dozens of similar locos ordered by railroads around the world from a catalogue. Lyn was just one of those manufactured with a number of modifications.
I'm grateful to Bachmann for reintroducing something that looks and feels pretty good and at what is really a toy price. Good on them, and I'll echo an earlier comment that their customer service and guarantee is superb.
mines on order
Martino
Photography, The GWR, Aviation, Travel, Cars.
Part of my new one got pulled apart this afternoon, so I could see what the speaker was like. I think it will need to be replaced or Axel at Train Li USA won't get me a sound card! His standards are very high. I also Tried to measure the stall current. My test came out at 5amps. I don't trust my own abilities there, so I'm going to call Bachmann tomorrow and ask them.
Attached are some photos of the inside of the cab with the cab removed.
As you can see the backhead detail is vastly improved on the earlier version.
This weekend one of my other projects has been to get my original Lyn back into acceptable working condition. Not an easy task, but I did achieve it. From that experience I would say that although the body of the new one is probably based on the old (the cab certainly is) I think they have done a great deal of additional detail, so it's not a direct copy.
I'll let you know what I find out about the stall current and what Axel at Train Li suggests for a DCC card/sound card.
Attached are some photos of the inside of the cab with the cab removed.
As you can see the backhead detail is vastly improved on the earlier version.
This weekend one of my other projects has been to get my original Lyn back into acceptable working condition. Not an easy task, but I did achieve it. From that experience I would say that although the body of the new one is probably based on the old (the cab certainly is) I think they have done a great deal of additional detail, so it's not a direct copy.
I'll let you know what I find out about the stall current and what Axel at Train Li suggests for a DCC card/sound card.
garrymartin
My Family,Railways, Beer and the Seaside
Are both funnels included in the non Southern versions?
duncan1_9_8_4
UK Railway Signaller and Garden Railway Operator
Thinking of getting two of these shortley. what is the weight and pulling power like? thanks.
Hi Duncan
Having just done a little bit more testing I'd say that the pulling power of the Lyn is pretty good. It's not going to be hauling massive trains, but certainly has Had no problems with anything I've given it so far. For example a pair of Brandbright VOR bogey coaches and a short rake of goods wagons with loads of shingle. Both were pullled happily as well as being pushed up my short incline by Lyn.
I haven't seen any wheel spinning yet, so I guess the weight is fine.
Sorry the reply isn't a bit more scientific, but in summary I wouldn't worry about the pulling power or weight.
Cheers
Having just done a little bit more testing I'd say that the pulling power of the Lyn is pretty good. It's not going to be hauling massive trains, but certainly has Had no problems with anything I've given it so far. For example a pair of Brandbright VOR bogey coaches and a short rake of goods wagons with loads of shingle. Both were pullled happily as well as being pushed up my short incline by Lyn.
I haven't seen any wheel spinning yet, so I guess the weight is fine.
Sorry the reply isn't a bit more scientific, but in summary I wouldn't worry about the pulling power or weight.
Cheers
PaulRhB
This Way Up
More wheels will mean more adhesion as you have more contact area. Less wheels is good for speed which is why most passenger locos have fewer big wheels and freight locos have more but small ones.
Higher axle loading is better for adhesion with the same number of wheels than a lighter loco that's all
Higher axle loading is better for adhesion with the same number of wheels than a lighter loco that's all
duncan1_9_8_4
UK Railway Signaller and Garden Railway Operator
thats great, takes the fun out of it when science is involved.
I have the old Lyn bought secondhand on Ebay 15 months ago and successfuly converted to battery radio control. My first outdoor train and still going strong, so very pleased with it. I understand electronics so that part was easy but taking the motor to bits to isolate the wiring from the pick up was very challenging. Will I still have to do that with the new version or have they changed the wiring so I can convert without taking the motor to bits?
Michael
Michael